Bullshittery in the David K Case

David K has a public apology on his blog. For some reason, some people have characterized it as a release for David K.

These masses are almost as isolated from reality as a Palin family reunion!

David K's apology doesn't present a loss. It really represents a win. Anyone who knows their ass from a hollow in the earth knows that it was likely because of a settlement. It could've been much worse.

David K could've been constrained to pay big bucks.

I talked to lawyers - you recognise the multitude who really live the law - and they said that if the people suing David K really felt like they had a case, they would've gone in for the kill. Instead, they settled for an apology.

Anyone who knows David K, knows this: he probably only apologized to put this behind him. You see, you can have someone apologize, but you can't take them think it.

So what did the plaintiff really win out of the situation?

The result is nothing.

Its not like David K can't blog any more. It's not wish the blogger police came to his blog, put up crime scene tape and road-blocked his box of the internet. The blame thing is around 40 words. Hell that's only slightly longer than a tweet.

When we were kids and would conflict with one another, my mom always made us apologize. We never meant it. I'm still annoyed at my baby for losing my GI Joes in an irrigation canal and I'm still not bad for what I did to her dolls in retaliation. Once I'm sure the statute of limitations has passed, I'll explain what precisely I did to them. I know two states away, she'd have to drive 7 hours to come kick my ass for it anyway!

In my view this whole courtship was an effort to quiet a voice critical of the two most powerful attorneys in town. They get the power to say some very controversial things about elected officials, the police, other lawyers, and judges.

Some have pointed out to me a course that was scripted in a blog recently Theresa Caballero, who is a faithful companion of the plaintiff Stuart Leeds. In a prolusion to a letter written by both Caballero and Leeds, the next was written:


"Judge" Smith does not like blogs being written about him. Another example of"Judge" Smith`sdisturbing mind is that he has actuallywhinedto the State Bar that my blogs are disrespectful to him.Poor "Judge" Smith!


Some say the fact that the DK suit was nearly the fact that the plaintiff didn't like blogs being written about him is really ironic.


Personally, I think itshilarious. DK didn't lose, he won.


DK bumaye!